Skip to content
Uncategorized

Proportion (architecture) 01

Proportion (architecture)
From
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Proportion is the relation between elements and a whole.
Proportion is a correspondence
among the measures of the members of an entire work, and of the whole to a
certain part selected as standard. From this result the principles of
symmetry.
Without symmetry and proportion there can be no principles in the design of
any temple; that is, if there is no precise relation between its members as
in the case of those of a well shaped man. —
Vitruvius,  The Ten Books of Architecture (III, Ch. 1)
A Fibonacci spiral, created by
drawing arcs connecting the opposite corners of squares in the Fibonacci tiling
shown above – see
golden spiral
A tiling with squares whose sides
are successive Fibonacci numbers in length
Architectural
proportions
In
architecture
the whole is not just a
building but the set and setting of the site. The things that make a building and its site “well
shaped” include the
orientation
of the site and the buildings on it to the features of the grounds on which it
is situated.
Light, shade, wind, elevation, choice of materials,
all should relate to a
standard and say what is it that makes it what it is, and what is it
that makes it not something else.
Vitruvius
thought of proportion in terms of
unit fractions such
as those used in the
Greek Orders of Architecture.
Orders of Architecture
Scribes
had been using unit fractions for their calculations at least since the time of
the
Egyptian
Mathematical Leather Roll
and Rhind
Mathematical Papyrus
in Egypt and the Epic of Gilgamesh  in Mesopotamia.
One
example of symmetry might be found in the inscription grids
of the Egyptians which were based on parts of the body and
their symmetrical relation to each other,
fingers, palms, hands, feet, cubits, etc; Multiples of body proportions would be found in the
arrangements of fields and in the buildings people lived in.
A
cubit could be divided into fingers, palms, hands and so could a
foot, or a multiple of a foot. Special units related to feet as
the hypotenuse of a 3/4/5 triangle with one side a foot were named
remen and introduced into the proportional system very early on. Curves were also defined in a similar manner and used by
architects in their design of arches and other building elements.
These
proportional elements were used by the Persians, Greeks, Phoenicians and
Romans, in laying out cities, stadiums, roads, processional ways, public
buildings, ports, various areas for crops and grazing beasts of burden, so as
to arrange the city as well as the building to be well proportioned,
Architectural
practice has often used proportional systems to generate or constrain the forms
considered suitable for inclusion in a building. In almost every building
tradition there is a system of mathematical relations which governs the
relationships between aspects of the design. These systems of proportion are
often quite simple; whole number ratios or easily constructed geometric shapes
(such as the
vesica piscis or the golden ratio).
Generally
the goal of a proportional system is to produce a sense of coherence and
harmony among the
elements of a building.


Sacred proportions
Among
the
Cistercians, Gothic, Renaissance, Egyptian, Semitic, Babylonian, Arab, Greek and Roman traditions; the harmonic proportions, human proportions,
cosmological/astronomical proportions and orientations, and various aspects of
sacred geometry
(the vesica piscis),
pentagram, golden ratio, and small whole-number ratios) were all applied as part of
the practice of architectural design.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/19/ChartresWestEndDB407.jpg/200px-ChartresWestEndDB407.jpg
West end of Chartres
In
the design of European cathedrals the necessary engineering to keep the
structures from falling down gradually began to take precedence over or at
least to have an influence on aesthetic proportions. Other concerns were
symbolic astronomical references such as the towers of the Sun and Moon at
Chartres and
references to the various
astrological
and
alchemical
relationships being discovered by the natural
philosophers
and
sages of the renaissance.
The
Roman Mille passus became the Myle of medieval western Europe and
Roman archs and
architecture while the mia chillioi influenced eastern Europe and its
Gothic arches and architecture. Today in the Western hemisphere the foot
is longer than the foote because of the researches of
Galileo, Gabriel Mouton,
Newton and
others into the period of a seconds
pendulum.
One
aspect of proportional systems is to make them as universally applicable as
possible, not just to one application but as a universal ideal statement of the
proper proportions. There is a relationship between length and width and
height; between length and area and between area and volume.
Doors and Windows are fenestrated. Fenestration
is important so that the negative area of openings has a relation to the area
of walls.
Plans are
reflected in sections and elevations. Themes are developed which spin off and
relate to but expand upon the themes found in other buildings. Often there is a
symbolic
sacred geometry which goes outside the proportions of the building to
relate to the oservations of the beauty of nature and its proportions in time
and space and the elements of
natural philosophy.
Then
it occurred to someone that there is more to it than just pleasing proportions.
Thomas Jefferson wrote of how the substantive scale of public buildings
made a statement of
government stability and gave a nation consequence.
Going
back in time the same logic applied to the
Pyramids of Egypt,
the
Hanging
Gardens of Babylon
, the Mortuary Temple
of Hatshepset, the
Temple of Solomon,
the
Treasury of Athens, the Parthenon, and the Cathedrals
and
Mosques and Corporate
Towers. The Casinos of Las Vegas
and the
underwater hotels of Dubai are all competing to be the tallest, the biggest, the
brightest, the most exciting to get international trade to come there and do
business. In other words the modern business ethos is to be out of proportion,
overscaling all the competition.
Part
of the practice of
feng shui is a proportional system based on the double tatami mat.
Feng Shui also includes within it the ideas of cosmic orientation and ordering,
as do most systems of “Sacred Proportions”.


Harmony
and proportion as sacred geometry
Going
back to the
Pythagoreans there is an idea that proportions should be related to
standards and that the more general and formulaic the
standards
the better. This idea that there should be beauty and elegance evidenced by a
skillful composition of well understood elements underlies mathematics in
general and in a sense all the architectural modulors of design as well.
The
idea is that
buildings should scale down to dimensions
humans can relate to and scale up through distances humans can travel as a
procession of revelations which may sometimes invoke
closure, or
glimpses of views that go beyond any encompassing
framework
and thus suggest to the observer that there is something more besides, invoking
wonder and awe.
The
classical standards are a series of
paired opposites
designed to expand the dimensional constraints of the harmony and proportion.
In the Greek ideal Vitruvius addresses they are
similarity,
difference,
motion, rest, number, sequence and consequence.
These
are incorporated in good architectural design as philosophical categorization;
what similarity is of the essence that makes it what it is, and what difference
is it that makes it not something else? Is the size of a column or an arch
related just to the structural load it bears or more broadly to the presence
and purpose of the space itself?
The
standard of motion originally referred to encompassing change but has now been
expanded to buildings whose kinetic mechanisms may actually determine change
depend upon harmonies of
wind, humidity, temperature, sound, light, time of day or night, and previous cycles of change.
The
stability victim of inflicted madness is questionable
architectural
standard of the
universal set of proportions references the totality of the built environment
so that even as it changes it does so in an ongoing and continuous process that
can be
measured, weighed, and judged as to its orderly harmony.
Sacred geometry
has the same
arrangement of elements found in compositions of music and nature at its finest incorporating light and shadow, sound and silence, texture and smoothness, mass and airy lightness,
as in a forest glade where the leaves move gently on the
wind or a sparkle of metal catches the eye as a ripple of water on a pond.


Classical orders
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cd/Hephaistos.temple.AC.02.jpg/280px-Hephaistos.temple.AC.02.jpg
Temple of Hephaestus
The
classical orders here illustrated by the Temple of Hephaestus in Athens, showing columns with Doric capitals are largely
known through the writings of
Vitruvius,
particularly De Archetura (The Ten Books of Architecture) and studies of
classical architecture by Renaissance architects and historians. Within a
classical order elements from the positioning of
triglyphs
to the overall height and width of the building were controlled by principles
of proportionality based on column diameters. Typically
Ionic column
bases are molded and about 1/2 the diameter of the column. They reduce in
detail from the
Temple of Artemis of Ephesus built c 560 BC and the Heraion of Samos
c 550 BC to elongated detail in the
Temple of Athena c 535 BC, then begin to soften their lines in the Temple of Nike at Apteros c 342 BC and begin to emphasise circular rounds in the
north porch of the
Erechteum c 421 BC. This establishes the elements of the form which
remains virtually unchanged through the
Temple of Fortuna c 40 BC, the Baths of Diocletian AD 306, and the classical Greek orders of Andrea Palladio
in the 16th century. Long before the Greeks international trade and commerce
led to standardization of units and the facilitation of calculations in
unit fractions
throughout the civilized world. In architectural terms, the dimensions of
structural elements like
posts, beams, columns, arches, openings and fenestrations
constructed of wood and stone were slowly standardized as regards the expected
load and span so that a given dimension could support a given load
without
failure.
By
way of contrast to the elongated Ionic order, Doric orders never became so
slender as to require a base but do have entasis as the
column shaft tapered upwards like a degree of the Earth’s surface.
The column shafts of the Doric order are always
fluted and twenty flutes is the usual number. The column capital has an abacus square in plan and a rounded echinus which
supports it. The Doric entablature has a deep plain
architrave,
large
Triglyphs
in the
frieze and a
series of mutles in the
cornice sloping as the roof rafters of a wooden structure. The
greatest change in the
dentiled entablature from Ionic through Corinthian
is in the addition of the
frieze and scrolled modillions
to the
cyma in
Corinthian styles.
The
proportions of entablature to
parapet remain
the same at 2:2 in all styles as do the proportions of cap, die and base at
1/4:1:3/4 in the parapet. In all styles the Cornice has the proportion of 3/4
but the frieze and architrave vary from 3/4:1/2 in the Doric style to 5/8:5/8
in the Ionic and Corinthian styles. Capitals are 1/2 in all styles except
Corinthian which is 3/4. The shaft width is always 5/6 at the top. Column shaft
heights are Tuscan 7, Doric 8, Ionic 9 and Corinthian 10. Column bases are
always 1/2. In the Pedestal, caps are always 1/4, dies are 8/6 and bases are
3/4. In the quarter of the column entasis, Tuscan styles are 9/4, Doric are
10/4, Ionic are 11/4 and Corinthian columns are 12/4.
Having
established the column proportions we move on to its arcade which may be
regular with a single element at a spacing of 3 3/4 D, coupled with two
elements at 1 1/3 D spaced 5 D, or alternating at 3 3/4 spaced 6 1/4 D.
Variations include adding a series of arches between column cap and entablature
in the Renaissance style
arcade, adding a keystone in the archivolt
in the Roman style arcade, and adding more detail in the
Palladian
arcade. Exterior door widths W, have trim 1/5 W for exterior doors and 1/6 W
for interior doors. Door heights a re 1 D less than column heights. Anciently
if a door is two cubits or between 36″ and 42″ in width, then its
trim is between a
fist and a span in width.


Proportioned
vs dimensioned modules
The
Greek classical orders are all
proportioned
rather than
dimensioned or measured modules and this is because the earliest modules were not based on body parts and their spans, fingers, palm (unit)s, hands, feet, remen, cubits, ells, yards, paces and fathoms which became standardized for bricks, and boards, before the time of the Greeks, but rather column diameters and the widths of arcades and fenestrations.
Typically
one set of column diameter modules used for casework and architectural
moldings by the Egyptians, Romans and English is based on the proportions of the palm and the finger,
while another less delicate module used for
door and window trim, tile work, and roofing in Mesopotamia
and
Greece is based
on the proportions of the hand and the thumb.
Board modules tend to round down for planing and finishing while masonry tends to
round down for
mortar. Fabric, carpet and rugs tend to be manufactured in feet, yards and ells.
In
Palladian or
Greek
Revival architecture
as in Jefferson classic revival,
modern modular dimensional systems based on the golden ratio and other pleasing
proportional and dimensional relationships begin to influence the design as
with the modules of the
volute. One interface between proportion and dimension is the
Egyptian inscription grid. Grid
coordinates
can be used for things like unit
rise and run.
The
architectural
foot as a
reference to the
human body was incorporated in architectural standards in Mesopotamia,
Egypt, Greece, Rome and Europe. Common multiples of a foot in buildings tend to
be decimal or octal and this affects the
modulars used in
Building materials. Elsewhere it is a
multiple of palms,
hands and fingers which are the primary referents. Feet were usually divided
into palms or hands, multiples of which were also
remen and cubits.
The
first known foot referenced as a standard was from
Sumer, where a rod at the feet of a statue of Gudea of Lagash from around 2575 BC is
divided into a foot and other units.
Egyptian foot units have the same length as Mesopotamian foot units,
but are divided into palms rather than hands converting the
proportional
divisions from
sexagesimal to septenary units. In both cases feet are further subdivided into digits.
In
Ancient Greece, there are several different foot standards generally
referred to in the literature as
short, median and long which give rise to different architectural styles known as Ionic, and Doric in
discussions of the
classical orders of architecture. The Roman foot or pes is divided into digitus, uncia and palmus which are
incorporated into the Corinthian style.
Some
of the earliest records of the use of the foot come from the Persian Gulf
bordered by
India (Meluhha), Pakistan, Beluchistan,
Oman (Makkan),
Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain (Dilmun), the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia
where in Persian architecture it is a sub division of the
Great circle
of the earth into 360 degrees. In
Egypt, one degree was 10 Itrw or River journeys.
In Greece a degree was 60 Mia chillioi or thousands and comprised 600
stadia, with one stadion divided
into 600
pous or feet.
In Rome a degree was 75 Mille Passus or 1000 passus. Thus the degree division
was 111 km and the stadion 185 m. One
Nautical mile
was 10 stadia or 6000 feet. The incorporation of proportions which relate the
building to the earth it stands on are called
sacred geometry.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *